Hard vs. Soft Communication Round 2
3 Sep, 2020

(How this started: Part 1 hard vs. soft communication)

Part 2 is a guest post from Sara Shipley:

When your aim is mutual value you’re seeking what’s best for both you and the other person (intention). When you view yourself as a person among people, you value their time just as much as yours. Just like you wouldn’t choose to waste your own time with ineffectual and indirect communication, you shouldn’t waste theirs either.

Directness isn’t a signal of status, but is instead the method by which one truth seeker most effectively guides themselves and the other person to the mutual goal.

Share with your network:

More to explore

Form following function

When form leads: Re-architected processes with no throughputEndless meetingsDebate about the right “way” is abstracted from what flows through1x results, especially in “agile” over-measured creative production When form leads: Innovation in...

read more

Delegating Genius

I just learned this from one Jared Montz, a genius (and former pro MLS player, YouTube star, franchise owner, CEO). It’s that sometimes coaching/teaching moments with your team work better from an outside voice, even when you have what’s needed. So...

read more

Living through articles, TV, and other voices

I think the temptation is this: the draw to be part of something bigger. It’s not different than becoming superhuman in a video game. Living your own mundane, right in front of you, life is just land grandiose on first blush. But it’s not...

read more


Family tech, neuroscience, communication, product management, growth

A synthesizer of neuroscience, classical rhetoric, philosophy, 5,000+ hours at whiteboards, high stakes presentations, Fortune 10 consulting, and startup growth.

Copyright © 2020 Isaiah McPeak